On NPR's Day to Day, Madeleine Brand has a piece on how college students don't seem to get the difference between internet privacy and general privacy. In talking to a group of Southern Cal students, they don't think -- to use their own term -- "Facebook stalking" is that big a deal unless it invades the real world. However, when asked if the government should listen to phone calls or employers should Google their digital personas, they were, well, shocked, shocked and appalled at the invasion of their privacy. Brand has dug up a Harvard Law Review article by Samuel Warren and Louis Brandies that I will not do my own googling for a copy. It is scary on the mark to today, another example of what's old becomes new again. Writing in 1890:
"Instantaneous photographs and newspaper enterprise have invaded the sacred precincts of private and domestic life, and numerous mechanical devices threaten to make good the prediction that what is whispered in the closet shall be proclaimed from the housetops." -- transcribing the NPR story, quoting Warren and Brandies.
At the end of the story, there is a brief primer on privacy law cases, and posing the question of liability if one violates the privacy of another with your SNW.
Listen to the story at: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6710445
Tuesday, January 02, 2007
Required listening today on NPR
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment